Pure Encapsulations Liposomal Glutathione Review

Updated Jun 5, 2026By Felix Hesse5 criteria scored3 peer-reviewed sourcesAffiliate links

Pure Encapsulations Liposomal Glutathione, 60 softgels — front of bottle#1 of 10 · Best overall✓ Label verified · Supplement Facts read Sep 7, 2026

Real retailer photo, cut out. Label unedited.

Our Verdict

Buy it. The cleanest practitioner-grade liposomal — pay the premium to sidestep the absorption debate. The named Setria glutathione in a liposomal phospholipid complex, from a clean-label practitioner brand — the most credible single answer to the question of whether oral glutathione absorbs.

Liposomal delivery, the best-evidenced routeNamed Setria glutathione, clean labelAbout $0.92 a softgel
8.5SAC Product Score™
StrongestForm & absorption strategy9.51
WeakestValue per day6.0
Where It Stands Among The 10 Ranked Glutathione Supplements
#1 · 8.5

$55 / 60 softgels (~2-month supply at 1/day)≈ $0.92 / 375 mg softgel

Score × Label

Why It Scores 8.5 — And The Label Line Behind Each Number

Form & absorption strategy

30% of score
9.51

Liposomal phospholipid encapsulation of the named Setria glutathione — the best-evidenced delivery answer to the absorption objection (Sinha 2018 showed liposomal GSH raised body stores + immune markers). This is precisely the form that exists because plain oral GSH is doubted (Witschi 1992), and it's the cleanest-label execution of it. Top-tier on the axis that matters most.

Active form
Liposomal (phospholipid-encapsulated) Setria reduced glutathione
Delivery evidence
Liposomal GSH raised body stores + immune markers in Sinha 2018

Dose vs studied range

25% of score
8.53

375 mg per softgel — below the 500 mg plain capsules, but scored generously because the liposomal form is the point: a protected, better-absorbed 375 mg is not directly comparable to a larger plain dose the gut degrades. Still sits within a sensible daily range. Not penalised the way an under-dosed plain capsule would be.

Per serving
375 mg glutathione (1 softgel); label allows 1-2/day

Testing & label transparency

20% of score
9.01

Named Setria source plus Pure Encapsulations' practitioner-channel, hypoallergenic, free-from clean-label pedigree — among the most transparent and trusted brand stories in the category. Held just short of a perfect mark only because there's no third-party NSF/USP seal explicitly called out.

Source
Setria branded glutathione (Kyowa, Japan)

Value per day

15% of score
6.0

At roughly $0.92 per 375 mg softgel, it's among the most expensive picks per serving — the price of the practitioner brand plus the liposomal delivery. Core Med Science (#2) delivers a higher 500 mg liposomal dose for less. This is the weakest axis; you're paying for form and label, not value.

Count
60 softgels (~2-month supply at 1/day)
Price
$55 / 60 softgels ≈ $0.92 per 375 mg softgel

Real-world fit

10% of score
8.52

One softgel a day is simple and consistent-friendly. The mark off: the liposomal matrix contains soy lecithin and the shell is gelatin, so it's not vegan and not soy-free — an inherent constraint of the softgel-liposomal format that some buyers can't accept.

More Specs
Contains
Soy (phospholipid/lecithin matrix); gelatin softgel — not vegan
Brand pedigree
Practitioner-channel, hypoallergenic, free-from formulation

Label verified. Every figure read from the Supplement Facts photo, Sep 7, 2026.

Truth Check

Marketing Claims Vs. Reality

Partial
Liposomal delivery enhances glutathione absorption.

Supported at the form level — Sinha 2018 (PMID 28853742) found oral liposomal glutathione raised body stores and immune markers, the best human evidence for any delivery form. 'Partial' because that trial wasn't this specific product, and liposomal quality varies between brands. The mechanism and category evidence are real; product-specific proof isn't claimed.

Verified
Contains Setria branded glutathione.

The listing states Setria — Kyowa's named, clinically-referenced reduced glutathione. Pairing a verifiable named source with the liposomal delivery is exactly what makes this the premium pick.

Verified
375 mg glutathione per softgel.

The 375 mg per-softgel dose is as stated. Lower than the 500 mg plain capsules by design — the liposomal form is intended to make those milligrams more usable, not to match raw count.

Partial
Hypoallergenic / free-from formulation.

True to Pure Encapsulations' broader clean-label philosophy (no unnecessary excipients), but the liposomal matrix contains soy and the softgel is gelatin — so 'hypoallergenic' has real limits here. Honest as a formulation ethos, qualified by the soy and gelatin that the delivery form requires.

Partial
Supports antioxidant, detox, and immune function.

Glutathione's antioxidant and detox roles are established biology, and Sinha 2018 specifically linked liposomal GSH to improved immune markers — so the immune angle is the best-supported of the three for this form. 'Partial' reflects that these are mechanism-and-marker findings, not hard clinical-outcome proof.

The Deep Dive

What Our Test Actually Found

01

Liposomal is the form with the most human evidence — that's the core of the case

Among the strategies to get oral glutathione absorbed, liposomal encapsulation has the strongest human data: Sinha 2018 found oral liposomal GSH raised body stores of glutathione and improved natural-killer and T-cell markers. That directly answers the objection raised by Witschi 1992 (plain GSH didn't reach plasma) and Allen 2011 (plain GSH moved no biomarkers in 4 weeks). Pairing that best-evidenced form with the named Setria material is what earns this the premium slot — it's the most defensible way to take oral glutathione if you accept the cost.

02

The 375 mg number is a feature of the form, not a shortfall

Don't read 375 mg as under-dosing against the 500 mg plain capsules. The liposomal premise is that protection through digestion makes a given dose more usable, so a smaller protected dose can outperform a larger degraded one — which is exactly why head-to-head milligram comparisons across forms are misleading. We score it accordingly. If you do want a liposomal at a full 500 mg per serving, Core Med Science (#2) provides it, in two softgels, for less money.

03

You're paying for delivery and label — and it's the weakest axis

At about $0.92 per softgel this is among the priciest picks, and value is its clear soft spot. The premium buys two things: the liposomal delivery system and Pure Encapsulations' practitioner-grade clean-label reputation. Both are real, but a cost-focused buyer who still wants liposomal should look at Core Med Science (#2), and one who's comfortable with plain-form slow repletion can run the named-Setria capsule (#9) for a fraction of the daily cost.

04

The softgel's soy and gelatin are an inherent constraint

The same phospholipid matrix that protects the glutathione is what brings the soy, and the softgel shell is gelatin — so this is neither vegan nor soy-free, and that's structural to the softgel-liposomal format rather than a formulation oversight. Buyers with those restrictions are pushed back toward vegetarian plain capsules (#4, #9) and the plain-form absorption caveat. It's a genuine fork, and worth flagging before purchase.

Full analysis: all pros & cons (7), buy if / skip if
Pros
  • Liposomal phospholipid delivery — the best-evidenced answer to glutathione's absorption problem (Sinha 2018)
  • Uses the named Setria (Kyowa) material in the cleanest practitioner-grade label
  • Hypoallergenic, free-from formulation philosophy; one softgel a day
  • Directly targets the core objection that plain oral GSH may not absorb (Witschi 1992)
Cons
  • Among the most expensive picks per serving (~$0.92/softgel)
  • 375 mg rather than a full 500 mg per softgel (offset by the form, but lower elemental mg)
  • Contains soy (lecithin matrix) and gelatin softgel — not vegan, not soy-free
Buy If
  • The plain-form absorption debate bothers you and you'll pay to hedge it with the best-evidenced delivery form
  • You want the named Setria material in the cleanest practitioner-grade liposomal label
  • You value a free-from, hypoallergenic formulation philosophy
  • You prefer one softgel a day over a two-softgel or sublingual-liquid regimen
Skip If
  • You're cost-sensitive — this is the priciest pick per serving; Core Med Science (#2) is cheaper per mg and a plain Setria capsule (#9) is a fraction the daily cost
  • You're vegan or avoid soy — the softgel uses soy lecithin and gelatin
  • You want a full 500 mg per serving in one liposomal unit — that's Core Med Science (#2), in two softgels

The named Setria glutathione in a liposomal phospholipid complex, from a clean-label practitioner brand — the most credible single answer to the question of whether oral glutathione absorbs. Liposomal delivery has the best human support of any form (Sinha 2018), and this is the cleanest-label version of it. The costs: it's the priciest pick per serving (~$0.92/softgel), it's 375 mg rather than 500 mg, and the soy/gelatin softgel isn't vegan. Buy it if the absorption debate bothers you and you'll pay to hedge it; choose Core Med Science (#2) for the same idea at a higher dose and lower price, or a plain Setria capsule (#9) if you're comfortable with slow repletion.

Pure Encapsulations Liposomal Glutathione is the pick for the buyer who reads the oral-absorption debate and decides to pay to sidestep it. It pairs the named Setria glutathione with a liposomal phospholipid complex — a fat-sphere delivery system designed to protect the fragile tripeptide through digestion — and wraps the whole thing in Pure Encapsulations' practitioner-grade, free-from clean-label pedigree. It's the cleanest answer on our list to glutathione's central problem. That problem is real: plain oral GSH showed negligible plasma availability in Witschi 1992 and no biomarker change over four weeks in Allen 2011. Liposomal delivery is the most-evidenced response to it — Sinha 2018 found oral liposomal glutathione raised body stores and immune markers. The trade-offs here are equally real: it's the priciest pick per serving, it carries 375 mg rather than a full 500 mg, and the soy-and-gelatin softgel rules out vegans. Here's the full breakdown.

The Bottom Line

The cleanest practitioner-grade liposomal — the premium answer to 'does oral glutathione absorb?'

Pure Encapsulations Liposomal Glutathione is the pick for the buyer who takes the absorption debate seriously and will pay to hedge it properly. Liposomal delivery has the strongest human evidence of any oral-glutathione strategy (Sinha 2018 raised body stores and immune markers), this product pairs that form with the named, verifiable Setria material, and it does so in Pure Encapsulations' famously clean practitioner-grade label. As a credibility package, nothing else on the list quite matches it. The reasons to look elsewhere are about cost and constraints, not quality. It's the priciest pick per serving, so a cost-sensitive buyer who still wants liposomal should take Core Med Science (#2) — the same delivery idea at a full 500 mg for less — and a buyer comfortable with slow plain-form repletion can run the named-Setria capsule (Healthy Origins #9) for a fraction of the daily cost. The soy-and-gelatin softgel also rules it out for vegans and the soy-avoidant. But if you want the most defensible oral glutathione money can buy and the premium doesn't deter you, this is it — one softgel a day, judged over months.

Check price on Amazon
Alternatives

If This Doesn’t Fit — Try These

Frequently Asked

Quick Answers

What does 'liposomal' actually do for glutathione?

It tries to solve the absorption problem that hangs over plain oral glutathione. A liposome is a microscopic phospholipid (fat) sphere that encapsulates the glutathione, with the aim of physically shielding the fragile tripeptide from being broken down in the gut and improving its uptake. This isn't just theory: Sinha 2018 (PMID 28853742) found oral LIPOSOMAL glutathione raised body stores of glutathione and improved immune-function markers in healthy adults — the human trial that justifies the liposomal premium. It's the most-evidenced delivery answer to the objection that plain reduced GSH (Witschi 1992) may not absorb meaningfully.

Why only 375 mg when the plain capsules are 500 mg?

Because the form is doing the work, not the milligram count. The whole liposomal premise is that a protected, better-absorbed 375 mg can deliver more usable glutathione than a larger plain dose that the gut degrades — so comparing the numbers head-to-head is misleading. We score dose with that in mind, which is why this isn't penalised the way a genuinely under-dosed plain capsule would be. If you specifically want a liposomal at a full 500 mg per serving, Core Med Science (#2) carries that at a lower price (in two softgels).

Is it worth the premium over a plain reduced capsule?

It depends entirely on how much the absorption debate bothers you. If you read that plain oral GSH showed negligible plasma availability (Witschi 1992) and no biomarker change in 4 weeks (Allen 2011) and want to pay to sidestep that uncertainty, the liposomal route — with human evidence behind it (Sinha 2018) and the named Setria material — is the cleanest way to do it, and this is the cleanest-label version. If you're comfortable with slow plain-form repletion over months, the named-Setria plain capsule (Healthy Origins #9) costs a fraction as much per day. It's a confidence-versus-cost trade.

Is it vegan? What's in the softgel?

No — it's not vegan. The liposomal delivery relies on a phospholipid/lecithin matrix that contains soy, and the softgel shell is gelatin (animal-derived). That's an inherent trade-off of most softgel liposomals: the fat matrix that protects the glutathione is also what brings the soy and the gelatin shell. If you need a vegan or soy-free option, this isn't it — and you'd be looking at a vegetarian plain capsule (Jarrow #4, Healthy Origins #9) instead, accepting the plain-form absorption caveat in exchange.

Could I just take NAC instead and save money?

You could, and it's a legitimate cheaper route. NAC supplies cysteine so your body builds its own glutathione, absorbs well, and costs less — bypassing the absorption problem rather than engineering around it with liposomes. What you'd give up is the direct supply of glutathione itself and the specific liposomal-delivery evidence (Sinha 2018). This product is for the buyer who wants to supply glutathione directly AND maximise the odds it's absorbed; NAC is for the buyer who's happy to let the body do the synthesis cheaply. Both are defensible.

Research

Sources & Further Reading

3 peer-reviewed sources, each linked to PubMed
  1. [1] Sinha 2018 PMID 28853742 — Oral supplementation with liposomal glutathione elevates body stores of glutathione and markers of immune function. Oral liposomal glutathione raised body stores of glutathione and improved immune-function markers (NK and T-cell activity) in healthy adults. The human trial that justifies this product's liposomal premium.
  2. [2] Witschi 1992 PMID 1362956 — The systemic availability of oral glutathione. A single 3 g oral dose of plain glutathione did not raise plasma GSH — 'negligible' systemic availability. The objection that liposomal delivery exists to overcome.
  3. [3] Richie 2015 PMID 24791752 — Randomized controlled trial of oral glutathione supplementation on body stores of glutathione. 250-1000 mg/day plain oral glutathione raised body stores over 6 months — context for how slow plain-form repletion is, and why a better-absorbed liposomal form is attractive.

Affiliate disclosure: every Amazon link uses our Associates tag (superachieverclub-20). We earn a small commission at no cost to you; it funds independent reviews. We never accept payment to change a ranking.

#1 of 10 · Best overallPure Encapsulations Liposomal Glutathione8.5Check price