▸ Trust & Transparency

Why TrustSuper Achiever Club

Editorial independence, transparent affiliations, founder accountability. The rules behind every ranking — and the things we’ll never do, written down so you can hold us to them.

▸ Founder

Why this site exists.

Felix founded SAC in 2022 after burning a decade and ~$12K on supplements the wellness industry sold him as gospel. The rankings here exist because the lists he found when he started were lying. Real product reviews require time, money, and a willingness to call out brands that paid for the placement everywhere else. SAC is what that looks like, made public.

That’s the bar. If a ranking on this site doesn’t hold up to the 50/50 framework, it gets re-scored. If a brand starts paying us, it gets disclosed on the page where it ranks. If we make a mistake, it goes in the article’s public changelog with a date and a reason. No quiet edits.

4+
Years in market · since 2022
200+
Supplements personally tested
40+
Hours per article
▸ Editorial Independence

Four rules. Public. Non-negotiable.

These rules exist so a reader can audit any ranking against them. If we ever break one, screenshot this page and email us — we’ll either fix the article or remove it.

  • No paid rankings.We never accept payment to feature a product, change a ranking, or remove a competitor — not from a brand, an agency, or a PR rep with a free sample on offer.
  • We buy what we review. We pay for every product with our own money, or we test free samples that we still rank objectively against the rest. If a sample came free, the article says so.
  • Sponsorships come after the ranking. Brand sponsorships happen only aftera brand has already been ranked on merit. When they do, the article discloses it explicitly — and the ranking can’t move because of it.
  • We correct in public.If we get a ranking wrong, we update it publicly with the date and the reason. The change goes in the article’s changelog. We don’t do quiet edits.
▸ Affiliate Transparency

How SAC makes money — and what that buys us.

Two revenue streams, both disclosed on every article that uses them. Neither one moves a ranking. Both fund the time it takes to review products properly instead of regurgitating press releases.

Revenue Stream 1

Amazon Associatestag superachieverclub-20

When you buy through an Amazon link on this site, we earn a small commission. Your price is identical — Amazon pays us, not you.

This commission funds the independent reviews. It doesn’t change the ranking, the score, or the order of picks. Amazon doesn’t know what we’re going to recommend before we publish it.

Affiliate tag: superachieverclub-20.

Revenue Stream 2

bestsupplements-sac.comOur own brand

Some supplement categories were so badly served by the existing market that we built our own formulas. When a ranked product is one of ours, the card shows a “SAC formula” badge so you know up front.

We rank our own formulas against competitors using the same 50/50 framework as everyone else. We’ve been beaten by competitors before. We don’t hide it. The badge stays visible regardless of where we land in the list.

▸ Our Methodology

How a ranking actually gets decided.

Every supplement on the site scores out of 100, weighted 50/50 between our editorial assessment and verified community ratings. Neither half can stack the deck.

50% Editorial

What the evidence says.

Quality of human trials (RCTs > surveys), effect size vs placebo, dosing matched to the studies, and third-party testing for what’s actually in the bottle.

50% Community

What actually worked.

Verified-member ratings collected after running the full protocol — not drive-by stars. The community half unlocks at 20+ verified ratings per supplement.

Read the full methodology →
▸ Who Reviews What

Author transparency.

Every article on SAC has a named author. For now, that author is Felix. As the team grows, new authors get full bylines with their own bios and disclosure pages.

Felix — Founder & Editor

Personally tests every supplement before it goes into a ranking. Writes or edits every article. Two years deep in the category, ~$12K of personal spend on supplements across eight years before founding SAC.

Editorial questions, factual disputes, methodology pushback: hello@super-achiever.com. Felix reads every one.

▸ Corrections & Updates

We date-stamp everything. We correct in public.

Every article on SAC carries a last-updated date so you can see how fresh the underlying research is. Rankings re-sort on every page render — new studies and new verified ratings change the math, and the page reflects it.

When we make a major correction— a misread study, a wrong dose, a brand we ranked before their formula changed — we add a changelog entry to the top of the article. Date, what changed, why. No quiet edits. No silent demotions. If the change moved a brand up or down, the changelog says so.

Found a factual error? corrections@super-achiever.com. Include the article URL, the claim, and the source. We respond to every corrections email.

▸ What We Won’t Do

The anti-patterns we refuse to play along with.

These are the moves the wellness industry uses to sell supplements without earning the recommendation. None of them appear on this site. Ever.

  • No fake scarcity.No countdown timers, no “3 left in stock” banners, no “price going up Friday” nudges. If a supplement is worth buying today it’ll be worth buying next week.
  • No anonymous “doctor approved” claims. If a clinician is endorsing something on this site, they’re named, their credentials are listed, and you can verify them. No stock-photo white coats.
  • No MLM.We don’t link to multi-level marketing supplement brands and we don’t take affiliate deals that pay on downstream recruiting. If the brand’s revenue comes from signing up sellers instead of selling product, it doesn’t rank.
  • No TRT or pharma prescribing.We cover herbs, nutraceuticals, and lifestyle protocols. We don’t prescribe testosterone replacement, peptides, or pharma. For anything in that lane, see a doctor — a real one, with their name on the door.
▸ Contact

Three inboxes. All read.

Editorial, corrections, press — each one routes to a human. We answer methodology and corrections emails first; press takes a little longer.