The OXO Good Grips 11-pound scale is what happens when a company that over-engineers vegetable peelers builds a food scale. Everything about it is the sturdiest version of the idea: a stainless-steel platform that lifts off for proper hand-washing, buttons that click like they'll outlive you, and the category's single best ergonomic feature — a backlit display that pulls out from under the platform so a dinner plate or wide mixing bowl can never shadow the numbers. If you've ever crouched to peer under your own food to read a weight, this scale was designed for you. It sits at #2 in our lineup rather than #1 for two honest reasons our criteria make explicit. Resolution is a solid but unremarkable 1 g / ⅛ oz — enough for honest tracking, but without the 0.1 g fine mode the cheaper Etekcity offers for small calorie-dense foods. And at roughly $50 it's the most expensive pick here, which our value criterion (deliberately just 15%) reflects with the lowest value score in the top group. But on build and material — 25% of the score, and weighted that heavily on purpose — it's the clear leader at 9.6. This is the buy-once scale: pay more today, clean it easily, read it effortlessly, and still be using it in ten years. Here's the full breakdown.
Check on AmazonAffiliate link — Super Achiever Club earns a small commission at no extra cost to you.
Read the complete Weight Loss guide →Solid and dependable: 1 g / ⅛ oz resolution across the full 11 lb / 5 kg range, with stable readings and OXO's zero function for taring containers. That's everything honest tracking requires — but it lacks the 0.1 g fine mode of the Etekcity and Ozeri, which matters for small calorie-dense foods, so it scores below the precision leaders on our heaviest-weighted axis.
The pull-out backlit display is the standout feature of the entire category — it slides forward so a big plate or bowl never hides the readout, solving the most common daily annoyance of scale use. Zero/tare works cleanly, units switch between grams and pounds/ounces at a press. Fewer units than the multi-unit budget picks (no dedicated ml mode), which is the only thing keeping this score from the top.
The best on the list, and it isn't close. A stainless-steel platform that lifts off for real hand-washing, a housing and buttons built to OXO's usual over-engineered standard, and a design that survives years of daily kitchen abuse. Per our material principle, a removable food-safe stainless surface is the most hygienic arrangement here — the reason this is the buy-it-for-life pick.
At roughly $50 it's the priciest pick in the lineup — more than double the Etekcity — for the same 1 g headline resolution, so it takes the lowest value score in the top group. But value is deliberately our smallest criterion: what the premium buys (build, washability, the pull-out display) is real and durable. Fair price for a decade-class tool; poor price if you just need a number.
“The display pulls out from the base so large plates never block the readout.”
The pull-out display is the product's signature design feature, stated on the listing and visible in the product imagery. It directly addresses display shadowing — the most common ergonomic complaint with flat kitchen scales — and is unique in our eight-pick lineup.
“Stainless-steel platform removes for easy cleaning.”
Per the listing, the stainless weighing surface lifts off the scale body for washing. Combined with the food-safe stainless material, this is the most hygienic cleaning arrangement in our lineup and the basis of its top build-and-material score.
“Weighs up to 11 lb with 1 g / ⅛ oz precision.”
Manufacturer spec on the listing: 11 lb / 5 kg capacity at 1 g (metric) or ⅛ oz (imperial) increments. Matches the standard full-size capacity of the category; note it does not offer a 0.1 g fine mode — our accuracy score reflects that honestly.
“A food scale meaningfully helps weight loss.”
The category claim, and the only research-backed one on this page: people underestimated larger meals by ~38% in Wansink & Chandon 2006 (PMID 16954358) and misjudged solid foods roughly ten times more than liquids in Lasschuijt 2019 (PMID 31255647). A scale replaces that error with an exact gram weight — the device makes the calorie count honest; it doesn't change your body.
Most scale 'innovations' are screen dressing. This one solves a physical problem you hit daily: any plate or bowl wider than the platform overhangs the display, forcing you to duck and squint. The OXO's display slides forward on a solid rail until the numbers sit fully clear of the food, and the backlight plus large digits finish the job. For anyone who weighs meals on actual dinnerware — which is exactly how portion control works in practice — it's the single best ergonomic feature in the category, and no other pick in our lineup has an answer to it.
A food scale only works if it's used at every meal for months, and the scale that gets used is the one that's pleasant to use and trivial to clean. The OXO's removable stainless platform means raw chicken or oily dressing is a sink-wash away from gone, not a nervous wipe around electronics; the buttons and housing shrug off daily abuse. That's why our build-and-material criterion carries 25% and why the OXO's 9.6 on it — the best score in the lineup — is worth real money. Durability compounds: a scale that lasts ten years at $50 is cheaper than three $20 scales that annoy you into a drawer.
The honest gap in the spec sheet is that $50 buys 1 g / ⅛ oz — the same headline resolution as scales at a third of the price, and coarser than the 0.1 g fine mode on the $20 Etekcity. For meals and portions this never matters; for the small calorie-dense foods where a gram or two of oil is 15-20 calories, the Etekcity gives a tighter number. Our 35%-weighted accuracy criterion prices this in (8.8 vs the Etekcity's 9.6), and it's precisely why the best-built scale on the list is #2 rather than #1. Know which buyer you are before paying the premium.
The OXO Good Grips is the scale for the buyer who hates replacing things. Its 9.6 build-and-material score is the best in our lineup and reflects exactly what you can feel: a removable stainless platform you can wash at the sink, buttons and housing engineered to outlast the fad diets it will supervise, and the pull-out backlit display that makes it the only scale here you can always read with a full dinner plate on top. Used daily — which is the entire point of a food scale — those qualities are worth the premium. The two trade-offs are clear-eyed ones. It reads to 1 g rather than 0.1 g, so the small-food precision crown stays with the Etekcity (#1), and at ~$50 it costs more than twice as much as scales that produce the same honest gram number for a tracker. If accuracy-per-dollar is your metric, buy the Etekcity and don't look back. But if you want the version of this tool that's still on your counter in a decade — cleaning easily, reading effortlessly, never once making you crouch to see a number — this is the one to buy, and you only have to buy it once.
Check OXO · stainless steel platform · 1 g / ⅛ oz · 11 lb / 5 kg · backlit pull-out display on AmazonOur #1: the finest resolution on the list (0.1 g under 1 kg) on a 304 stainless platform with a bowl, for about $20. Choose it for maximum accuracy per dollar.
See it on the list →The simple, rugged workhorse — NSF-listed, two-button operation, years of proven daily durability at ~$25. Choose it if you want dependable simplicity without the OXO's price.
See it on the list →Double the capacity (22 lb / 10 kg) on a stainless-and-glass platform for batch-cooks and big roasts, at a bargain price. Choose it if volume is your constraint.
See it on the list →People substantially underestimated the calorie content of larger meals — by about 38% in study 1 — while judging small meals almost perfectly. The evidence for owning a food scale at all; the OXO's specs themselves are manufacturer claims, not research.
Estimation error was roughly ten times greater for solid foods than liquids — the foods a kitchen scale weighs. Weighing in grams beats eyeballing, whichever pick delivers the gram.
